1) What was the biggest surprise for you in the reading? In other words, what did you read that stood out the most as different from your expectations? This part of the reading was not surprising to me but I enjoyed it. That was about failure. I even said in a blog a week ago that failure always happens when trying to create something. If you do not fail a few times then I do not think you are trying hard enough. Failure is common when being an entrepreneur it's getting back up and coming back stronger that is important.
2) Identify at least one part of the reading that was confusing to you. With me it seems chapter after chapter the charts get the most confusing for me. I believe it is because I am a hands on kind of person. And seeing a chart all the way completed does not work for me.
3) If you were able to ask two questions to the author, what would you ask? Why? First question would be have you failed and came back stronger before? And do you believe all of these charts are extremely necessary.
4) Was there anything you think the author was wrong about? Where do you disagree with what she or he said? How? I do not believe the author was wrong about anything in this week's reading. I just need a better overview of all charts it seems like.
It isn't so much that he wasn't right about anything. I simply think that its troublesome how the autonomous, disrupted and unique ideas of a start up can fit in an unbending organization. I don't trust this was focused on enough.Social Entrepreneurship and the Ethical Challenges of Entrepreneurship I learned numerous new things. What emerged the most to me was an idea in part 4 about the three particular sorts of administration.
ReplyDeletedissertation writing service